Genesis of the educational space
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33910/2687-1262-2022-4-1-68-80Keywords:
space, architecture, educational buildings, schools, education institutions, classrooms, roomsAbstract
This article is an attempt to understand the characteristic features and genesis of the educational space in the history of human culture. I conclude that this space originates from the open areas and structures and other areas designated for various purposes in a traditional society. In different periods, it (the space) bore the imprint of religious (mainly in the Middle Ages) or palatial (largely in modernity) architecture, preserving a special sacredness, while in the 20th century it became the embodiment of typical mass construction and gained the additional meaning of a “second home”. Initially, educational practices were confined to small school, of which a permanent facility was not a fundamental attribute. Then that subsequently grew into communities and boarding schools. It was the need to provide accommodation that necessitated separate buildings. True educational architecture, including the idea of independent buildings for educational institutions, was shaped by higher education, and then propagated towards elementary education. First, higher education institutions gained independent buildings, then the secondary schools. Only recently did this trend reach preschool institutions. The understanding that educational institutions require dedicated buildings gained recognition in modern times and led to the spread of a unique type of large educational institutions. Educational architecture as an independent industry developed in the 19th century with the spread of single-class rural and monumental and highly decorated urban schools. Educational buildings generally followed the classroom layout; despite certain experiments with other layouts this one prevailed as it better fits the division of students into groups and lesson-based learning. Over time, special classrooms, laboratories, workshops, athletic and cultural spaces, and areas adjoining to the institutions were developed. Greater importance was given to health and safety. In the second half of the 20th century, there was a transition from monumental to simple functional educational buildings, tailored, to accommodating students throughout the day, ensuring effective education, and placing schools in walking distance from student’s homes. Subsequently, more attention was given to design for safety, comfort, and facilitating student’s interests.
References
ИСТОЧНИКИ
Быков, В. Е. (1973) Общественные сооружения. В кн.: В. Ф. Маркузон (ред.). Всеобщая история архитектуры: в XII т. Т. II. Архитектура античного мира (Греция и Рим). М.: Стройиздат, с. 297–362.
Синянский, И. А., Манешина, Н. И. (2014) Типология зданий. 7-е изд., перераб. и доп. М.: Академия, 288 с.
Тица, Л. (2018) История зданий образовательного назначения и архитектуры школ в Сербии. Архитектура и современные информационные технологии, № 2 (43), с. 197–211.
ЛИТЕРАТУРА
Клевцова, О. В., Жиров, Н. А. (2016) Школьные здания во второй половине ХIХ в.: технические и гигиенические требования (на примере Орловской губернии). История: факты и символы, № 4 (9), с. 8–14.
Клочко, А. Р., Коровина, Е. И. (2017) Развитие архитектуры школьных зданий в России и в мире. Архитектура и современные информационные технологии, № 2 (39), с. 98–113.
Цытович, Г. Н., Олтаршееский, Д. Г. (1977) Учебные здания. В кн.: Большая советская энциклопедия в 30 т. Т. 27. Ульяновск-Франкфорт. 3-е изд. М.: Советская энциклопедия, с. 153–155. URL: https://archive.org/details/B-001-032-604-ALL/page/n177/mode/2up (дата обращения 17.11.2020).
Смирнов, В. И., Южанинова, Е. В. (2012) История образования и педагогической мысли. Нижний Тагил: Нижнетагильская государственная социально-педагогическая академия, 454 с.
SOURCES
Bykov, V. E. (1973) Obshchestvennye sooruzheniya [Public buildings]. In: V. F. Markuzon (ed.). Vseobshchaya istoriya arkhitektury: v XII t. T. II. Arkhitektura antichnogo mira (Gretsiya i Rim) [General history of architecture: In XII vols. Vol. II. Architecture of the ancient world (Greece and Rome)]. Moscow: Strojizdat Publ., pp. 297–362. (In Russian)
Sinyanskij, I. A., Maneshina, N. I. (2014) Tipologiya zdanij [The typology of buildings]. 7th ed., rev. and add. Moscow: Akademiya Publ., 288 p. (In Russian)
Tica, L. (2018) Istoriya zdanij obrazovatel’nogo naznacheniya i arkhitektury shkol v Serbii [History of educational purpose buildings and architecture of schools in Serbia]. Arkhitektura i sovremennye informatsionnye tekhnologii — Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, no. 2 (43), pp. 197–211. (In Russian)
REFERENCES
Klevtsova, O. V., Zhirov, N. A. (2016) Shkol’nye zdaniya vo vtoroj polovine XIX v.: tekhnicheskie i gigienicheskie trebovaniya (na primere Orlovskoj gubernii) [The school building in the second half of the nineteenth century: Technical and hygienic re-quirements (on the example of the Oryol province)]. Istoriya: fakty i simvoly — History: Facts and Symbols, no. 4 (9), pp. 8–14. (In Russian)
Klochko, A. R., Korovina, E. I. (2017) Razvitie arkhitektury shkol’nykh zdanij v Rossii i v mire [Development of architecture of school buildings in Russia and in the world]. Arkhitektura i sovremennye informatsionnye tekhnologii — Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, no. 2 (39), pp. 98–113. (In Russian)
Tsytovich, G. N., Oltarsheeskij, D. G. (1977) Uchebnye zdaniya [Educational buildings]. In.: Bol’shaya sovetskaya entsiklopediya v 30 t. T. 27. Ul’yanovsk-Frankfort [Great Soviet Encyclopedia: In 30 vols. Vol. 27. Ulyanovsk– Frankfort]. 3rd ed. Moscow: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya Publ., pp. 153–155.
Smirnov, V. I., Yuzhaninova, E. V. (2012) Istoriya obrazovaniya i pedagogicheskoj mysli [History of education and pedagogical thought]. Nizhny Tagil: Nizhny Tagil State Socio-Pedagogical Academy Publ., 454 p. (In Russian).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Elena D. Dmitrieva

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The work is provided under the terms of the Public Offer and of Creative Commons public license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
This license permits an unlimited number of users to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use.
This license retains copyright for the authors but allows others to freely distribute, use, and adapt the work, on the mandatory condition that appropriate credit is given. Users must provide a correct link to the original publication in our journal, cite the authors' names, and indicate if any changes were made.
Copyright remains with the authors. The CC BY 4.0 license does not transfer rights to third parties but rather grants users prior permission for use, provided the attribution condition is met. Any use of the work will be governed by the terms of this license.





