The return to dialogue: Kyrgyzstan and Russia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33910/2687-1262-2019-1-1-21-27Keywords:
culture, civilization, dialogue, visual arts, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, artistic education, cultural heritageAbstract
The article analyses the dynamics of Kyrgyz art in the context of the 20th and 21st century culture. We are witness to an integrative breakthrough currently taking place: due to the creation and growth of the Eurasian Union, a new large-scale geopolitical integrity is being formed. The Kyrgyz Republic has become a full member of the Eurasian Union and has begun to establish new economic ties. However, a lasting alliance cannot exist without common ideological paradigms and goals, without the many common values accumulated over the last century in the spheres of science, education, social structure, security, and common historical memory. Above all is the value of friendship and cooperation between nations that generates joint creative activity in all spheres of Eurasian cultural space.
The article briefly recounts the development stages of the Soviet art of Kirghizia, influenced by the paradigm of the revolutionary 1920s and 1930s, tested by the hardship of war and post-war times, promoted during the era of high civilisational achievements of the 1960s and 1970s, affected during the subsequent sociocultural crisis, and, finally, revitalized in the period of cultural transformation in sovereign Kyrgyzstan. The author raises the issue of the modern development of art based on the cultural dialogue between Russia and the countries of the Eurasian Union with the emphasis on the need for cultural understanding of the Eurasian phenomenon and its systematic components of interconnected loci in the context of modern science. Art can also become an indispensable institution integrating the Eurasian space, a universal platform for a dialogue between cultures. From this point of view, it is necessary to return to the established formats of dialogue between Russian and Kyrgyz artists and also to create specific new ways of interaction in the field of visual arts.
References
ЛИТЕРАТУРА
Боконбаев, Г. (2007) Неизвестный Чуйков. Курак. Центральноазиатский альманах «Искусство и общество», № 2 (8), с. 97–103.
Глазьев, С. Ю. (2013) Научный доклад: «О целях, проблемах и мерах государственной политики развития и интеграции». 21 января 2013 г. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://spkurdyumov.ru/future/o-celyaxproblemax-i-merax-gosudarstvennoj-politiki-razvitiya-i-integracii/ (дата обращения 01.07.2019).
Гусейнов, А. А. (2015) «Свои» и «чужие» в глобализирующемся мире. В кн.: А. С. Запесоцкий (ред.). Международные Лихачевские научные чтения. Глобализация и диалог культур. Избранные доклады (1995–2015). СПб.: СПбГУП, с. 66–71.
Запесоцкий, А. С. (2018) Диалог культуры в сфере искусства. В кн.: А. С. Запесоцкий. Становление глобальной культуры и конфликты цивилизаций. СПб.: СПбГУП, с. 212–233.
Мосолова, Л. М. (1975) Скульптура и монументально-декоративное искусство Киргизии. Фрунзе: Кыргызстан, 52 с.
Полевой, В. М. (ред.) (1989) Двадцатый век. Изобразительное искусство и архитектура стран и народов мира. М.: Советский художник, 456 с.
Уметалиева, Дж. Т. (ред.). (2010) Творческие портреты мастеров профессионального искусства Кыргызстана. Часть 1. Бишкек: Турар, 752 с.
REFERENCES
Bokonbaev, G. (2007) Neizvestnyj Chujkov [Unknown Chujkov]. Kurak. Tsentral’noaziatskij al’manakh “Iskusstvo i obshchestvo” — Kurak, № 2 (8), pp. 97–103. (In Russian)
Glaz’ev, S. Yu. (2013) Nauchnyj doklad: “O tselyakh, problemakh i merakh gosudarstvennoj politiki razvitiya i integratsii” [Scientific report: “On the goals, problems and measures of state policy of development and integration”]. 21 January 2013. [Online]. Available at: http://spkurdyumov.ru/future/o-celyax-problemax-i-meraxgosudarstvennoj-politiki-razvitiya-i-integracii/ (accessed 01.07.2019). (In Russian)
Gusejnov, A. A. (2015) “Svoi” i “chuzhie” v globaliziruyushchemsya mire [“Own” and “aliens” in a globalizing world]. In: A. S. Zapesotskij (ed.). Mezhdunarodnye Likhachevskie nauchnye chteniya. Globalizatsiya i dialog kul’tur. Izbrannye doklady (1995–2015) [International Likhachev scientific readings. Globalization and dialogue of cultures. Selected papers (1995–2015)]. Saint Petersburg: St Petersburg University of Humanities and Social Sciences Publ., pp. 66–71. (In Russian)
Mosolova, L. M. (1975) Skul’ptura i monumental’no-dekorativnoe iskusstvo Kirgizii [Sculpture and monumental-decorative art of Kyrgyzstan]. Frunze: Kyrgyzstan Publ., 52 p. (In Russian)
Polevoj, V. M. (ed.) (1989) Dvadtsatyj vek. Izobrazitel’noe iskusstvo i arkhitektura stran i narodov mira [Twentieth century. Fine art and architecture of countries and peoples of the world]. Moscow: Sovetskij Khudozhnik Publ., 456 p. (In Russian)
Umetalieva, Dzh. T. (ed.). (2010) Tvorcheskie portrety masterov professional’nogo iskusstva Kyrgyzstana [Creative portraits of masters of professional art of Kyrgyzstan]. Pt. 1. Bishkek: Turar Publ., 752 p. (In Russian)
Zapesotskij, A. S. (2018) Dialog kul’tury v sfere iskusstva [The dialogue of culture in the field of art]. In: A. S. Zapesotskij. Stanovlenie global’noj kul’tury i konflikty tsivilizatsij [The formation of a global culture and the conflict of civilizations]. Saint Petersburg: St Petersburg University of Humanities and Social Sciences Publ., pp. 212–233. (In Russian)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Lyubov M. Mosolova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The work is provided under the terms of the Public Offer and of Creative Commons public license Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license allows an unlimited number of persons to reproduce and share the Licensed Material in all media and formats. Any use of the Licensed Material shall contain an identification of its Creator(s) and must be for non-commercial purposes only.