Cultural history of Russia: Research perspectives and theoretical models

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33910/2687-1262-2025-7-4-318-330

Keywords:

Russian cultural history, macrohistory, grand history, binary type of culture, civilization, cultural dynamics

Abstract

This article describes the field of research focusing on the history of Russian culture. It argues that the formulation and systematization of ideas about the history of Russian and world culture, the logic of its development, and the peculiarities of its dynamics must be correlated with the ‘current point in time’ and with various aspects of modernity, within the framework of which models of history are interpreted and constructed. The article explores the technological and programming potential of models of cultural history — in particular, their value-oriented and educational aspects. It emphasizes that the perception of the history of national culture is of strategic importance for the formation of national identity, as well as cultural and historical memory. The article analyzes contemporary practices of studying the history of Russian culture in the context of various disciplines, theoretical and methodological approaches, and ways of focusing on certain aspects of historical and cultural reality. It describes the macro-historical perspective of studying the history of Russian culture, addressing contributing disciplines such as history, ethnography, folklore studies, art history, and others. Additionally, it examines culturological approaches to this issue, including activity-based, axiological, semiotic, and Gestalt-culturological frameworks. Examples of theories corresponding to various research vectors are provided, in particular, the works of A. Toynbee, N. Y. Danilevsky, K. N. Leontiev, P. A. Sorokin, I. E. Zabelin, B. A. Rybakov, L. N. Gumilev, A. S. Akhiezer, Y. M. Lotman, B. A. Uspensky, D. S. Likhachev, E. S. Markaryan, M. S. Kagan, I. V. Kondakov, and others. A number of parameters are proposed that combine various spatio-temporal aspects of history, its model, and the rhythms of era changes, serving as a foundation for a modern interpretation of the history of Russian culture.

References

СПИСОК ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ

Ахиезер, А. С. (1994) Самобытность России как научная проблема. Отечественная история, № 4–5, с. 3–25.

Кондаков, И. В. (2002) О механизмах повторяемости в истории русской культуры. В кн.: Н. А. Хренов (ред.). Искусство в ситуации смены циклов: Междисциплинарные аспекты исследования художественной культуры в переходных процессах. М.: Наука, с. 269–283.

Леонов, И. В. (2008) Феномен «переходности» в макродинамике культуры: парадигмальное осмысление. Диссертация на соискание учёной степени кандидата культурологических наук. СПб., РГПУ им. А. И. Герцена, 233 с.

Леонов, И. В. (2025) Когнитивные ловушки постмодернистских и конструктивистских моделей историко-культурного процесса. В кн.: Пятый Санкт-Петербургский международный культурологический симпозиум «Культурология в пространстве гуманитарного знания». СПб.: Изд-во СПбГУ, c. 125–126.

Лотман, Ю. М. (2002) История и типология русской культуры: Семиотика и типология культуры. Текст как семиотическая проблема. Семиотика бытового поведения. История литературы и культуры. СПб.: Искусство—СПБ, 768 с.

Успенский, Б. А. (1994) Избранные труды: в 2 томах. Т. 1. Семиотика истории. Семиотика культуры. М.: Гнозис, 429 с.

REFERENCES

Akhiezer, A. S. (1994) Samobytnost’ Rossii kak nauchnaya problema [Russia’s identity as scientific problem]. Otechestvennaya istoriya, no. 4–5, pp. 3–25. (In Russian)

Kondakov, I. V. (2002) O mekhanizmakh povtoryaemosti v istorii russkoj kul’tury [On the mechanisms of repetition in the history of Russian culture]. In: N. A. Khrenov (ed.). Iskusstvo v situatsii smeny tsiklov: Mezhdistsiplinarnye aspekty issledovaniya khudozhestvennoj kul’tury v perekhodnykh protsessakh [Art in a Situation of Changing Cycles: Interdisciplinary Aspects of Researching Artistic Culture in Transitional Processes]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., pp. 269–283. (In Russian)

Leonov, I. V. (2008) Fenomen “perekhodnosti” v makrodinamike kul’tury: Paradimal’noe osmyslenie [The phenomenon of “transition” in macrodynamics of culture: A paradigmatic interpretation]. PhD dissertation (Culturology). Saint Petersburg, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, 233 p. (In Russian)

Leonov, I. V. (2025) Kognitivnye lovushki postmodernistskikh i konstrukti-vistskikh modelej istoriko-kul’turnogo protsessa [Cognitive traps of postmodernist and constructivist models of the historical-cultural process]. In: Pyatyj Sankt-Peterburgskij mezhdunarodnyj kul’turologicheskij simpozium “Kul’tu-rologiya v prostranstve gumanitarnogo znaniya” [Fifth St. Petersburg international culturological symposium “Culturology in the space of humanitarian knowledge”]. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University Publ., pp. 125–126. (In Russian)

Lotman, Yu. M. (2002) Istoriya i tipologiya russkoj kul’tury: Semiotika i tipologiya kul’tury. Tekst kak semioticheskaya problema. Semiotika bytovogo povedeniya. Istoriya literatury i kul’tury [History and Typology of Russian Culture: Semiotics and Typology of Culture. Text as a Semiotic Problem. Semiotics of Everyday Behavior. History of Literature and Culture]. Saint Petersburg: Iskusstvo—SPB Publ., 768 p. (In Russian)

Uspenskij, B. A. (1994) Izbrannye trudy: V 2 tomakh. T. 1. Semiotika istorii. Semiotika kul’tury [Selected Works: In 2 volumes. Vol. 1. Semiotics of history. Semiotics of culture]. Moscow: Gnosis Publ., 429 p. (In Russian)

Published

2025-12-30

Issue

Section

Articles