Visualization of education: From books to videos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33910/2687-1262-2021-3-2-153-162Keywords:
visualization of education, visual image, creativity, visual communication, self-identification, hermeneutic approachAbstract
Visualization of modern education is part of the information revolution with its transition from traditional book culture to visual culture. In the information society, the key tool of generating, systematising, storing and translating knowledge is a visual image that has a range of advantages over the traditional verbal image. The development of new media — photography, cinema, television, and video — promotes the dissemination of complex polysemantic images. These texts require special knowledge and skills to be properly decoded and interpreted.
Early during the development of information society in the 60–80s, the semiotic and hermeneutic approaches based on the philosophy of language were an adequate way of mastering visual images. In the 90s, digital media created visual images that do not represent reality, but, rather, present it directly. This technique has been, since then, the main tool for constructing reality. The visualization of social space is perceived as a cultural transformation: the “culture of signification” gives way to the “culture of presence”. The images of the latter are getting more dynamic and have a continuous impact on the person. Thus, visual images of media reality are an effective way of a person’s self-identification in a complex multidimensional social space.
A shift in the understanding of the visual image and its cognitive possibilities fosters further development of philosophical methodology giving rise to more granular methods of research, including research in education studies. One of the modern philosophical methodologies of today is phenomenological hermeneutics. It reveals the projective possibilities of the visual image and its connection with the subject of perception in modern digital age with visual images as the structural principle of culture.
References
ЛИТЕРАТУРА
Аванесов, С. С. (2015) Предметная сфера и эпистемическая структура визуальной антропологии. ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Проблемы визуальной семиотики, № 1 (3), c. 11–20.
Александрова, Л. Д. (2018) Опыт саморефлексии в контексте медиареальности и цифровой культуры. Социум и власть, № 3 (71), с. 23–29.
Барт, Р. (2011) Camera lucida. Комментарий к фотографии. М.: Ад Маргинем Пресс., 272 с.
Бодрийяр, Ж. (2006) Пароли. От фрагмента к фрагменту. Екатеринбург: У-Фактория., 199 с.
Гумбрехт, Х.-У. (2006) Производство присутствия: Чего не может передать значение. М.: Новое литературное обозрение., 184 с.
Дроздова, А. В. (2017) Визуальные способы представления повседневности в новых медиа. Вестник Российского государственного гуманитарного университета. Серия: История. Филология. Культурология. Востоковедение, № 6 (27), c. 114–124.
Инишев, И. Н. (2011) Пространственность образности. Topos: Философско-культурологический журнал, № 1, c. 116–125.
Инишев, И. Н., Бедаш, Ю. А. (2016) Визуальное, социальное, образное: зрительное восприятие как фактор современной культуры. ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Проблемы визуальной семиотики, № 1 (7), c. 9–25.
Колодий, В. В. (2011) Видение и особенности современного визуального опыта. Известия Томского политехнического университета, т. 318, № 6, c. 114–119.
Колодий, Н. А, Колодий, В. В. (2010) Визуальный поворот и его влияние на социальное познание. Известия Томского политехнического университета, т. 316, № 6, c. 146–152.
Мерло-Понти, М. (1999) Феноменология восприятия. СПб.: Ювента; Наука., 605 с.
Нарский, И. В. (2008) Проблемы и возможности исторической интерпретации семейной фотографии (на примере детской фотографии 1966 г. из г. Горького). В кн.: И. В. Нарский (ред.). Очевидная история. Проблемы визуальной истории России XX столетия. Челябинск: Каменный пояс, с. 55–74.
Савчук, В. В. (2013) Феномен поворота в культуре XX века. Международный журнал исследований культуры, № 1 (10), c. 93–108.
Флюссер, В. (2008) За философию фотографии. СПб.: Изд-во Санкт-Петербургского университета., 146 с.
Фуко, M. (2018) Надзирать и наказывать. Рождение тюрьмы. M.: Ад Маргинем Пресс., 384 с.
Штомпка, П. (2007) Фотография как дополнение к другим методам социологии. В кн.: П. Штомпка. Визуальная социология. Фотография как метод исследования. М.: Логос, с. 45–77.
Эко, У. (2016) Роль читателя. Исследования по семиотике текста. М.: АСТ., 640 с.
REFERENCES
Aleksandrova, L. D. (2018) Opyt samorefleksii v kontekste mediareal’nosti i tsifrovoj kul’tury [Experience of self-reflection in the context of media reality and digital culture]. Sotsium i vlast’ — Society and Power, no. 3 (71), pp. 23–29. (In Russian)
Avanesov, S. S. (2015) Predmetnaya sfera i epistemicheskaya struktura vizualnoj antropologii [Subject area and epistemic structure of visual anthropology]. PRAΞGMA. Problemy vizualnoj semiotiki — PRAΞGMA. Journal of Visual Semiotics, no. 1 (3), pp. 11–20. (In Russian)
Barthes, R. (2011) Camera Lucida: Reflections on photography. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press., 272 p. (In Russian)
Baudrillard, J. (2006) Mots de passé. D’un fragment l’autre. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoria Publ., 199 p. (In Russian)
Drozdova, A. V. (2017) Vizual’nye sposoby predstavleniya povsednevnosti v novykh media [Visual representation of the everyday in new media]. Vestnik Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo Universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya. Filologiya. Kul’turologiya. Vostokovedenie, no. 6 (27), pp. 114–124. (In Russian)
Eco, U. (2016) The role of the reader: Explorations in the semiotics of texts. Moscow: АSТ Publ., 640 p. (In Russian)
Flusser, V. (2008) Towards a philosophy of photography. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg University Publ., 146 p. (In Russian)
Foucault, M. (2018) Surveiller et punir. Naissance de la prison. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press., 384 p. (In Russian)
Gumbrecht, H.-U. (2006) Production of presence: What meaning cannot convey. Мoscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 184 p. (In Russian)
Inishev, I. N. (2011) Prostranstvennost’ obraznosti [Spatiality of imagery]. Topos: Filosofsko-kul’turologicheskij zhurnal — Topos. The Journal Philosophy and Cultural Studies, no. 1, pp. 116–125. (In Russian)
Inishev, I. N., Bedash Yu. A. (2016) Vizual’noe, sotsial’noe, obraznoe: zritel’noe vospriyatie kak faktor sovremennoj kul’tury [The visual, social, and imaginative: Visual perception as a factor of contemporary]. PRAΞGMA. Problemy vizualnoj semiotiki — PRAΞGMA. Journal of Visual Semiotics, no. 1 (7), pp. 9–25. (In Russian)
Kolodij, V. V. (2011) Videnie i osobennosti sovremennogo vizual’nogo opyta [Vision and features of modern visual experience]. Izvestija Tomskogo politehnicheskogo universiteta — Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University, vol. 318, no. 6, pp. 114–119. (In Russian)
Kolodij, N. A., Kolodij, V. V. (2010) Vizual’nyj povorot i ego vliyanie na sotsial’noe poznanie [Visual twist and its effect on social cognition]. Izvestija Tomskogo Politehnicheskogo Universiteta — Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University, vol. 316, no. 6, pp. 146–152. (In Russian)
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1999) Phénoménologie de la perception. Saint Petersburg: Yuventa Publ.; Nauka Publ., 605 p. (In Russian)
Narskij, I. V. (2008) Problemy i vozmojnosti istoricheskoj interpretatsii semejnoj fotografii (na primere detskoj fotografii 1966 g. iz g. Gor’kogo) [Problems and possibilities of historical interpretation of family photography (in the example of a children’s photograph in 1966 from Gorky)]. In: I. V. Narskij (ed.). Oche-vidnaya istoriya. Problemy vizual’noj istorii Rossii XX stoletiya [An obvious story. Problems of the visual history of Russia in the XX century]. Chelyabinsk: Kamennyj poyas Publ., pp. 55–74. (In Russian)
Savchuk, V. V. (2010) Fenomen povorota v kul’ture XX veka [The phenomenon of turn in 20th century culture]. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal issledovanij kul’tury — International Journal of Cultural Research, no. 1 (10), pp. 93–108. (In Russian)
Zstompka, P. (2007) Fotografiya kak dopolnenie k drugim metodam sotsiologii [Photography as an addition to other methods of sociology]. In: P. Zstompka. Vizual’naya sotsiologiya: fotografiya kak metod issledovaniya [Visual sociology. Photography as a research method]. 2nd ed. Moscow: Logos Publ., pp. 45–77. (In Russian)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Elena M. Sergeychik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The work is provided under the terms of the Public Offer and of Creative Commons public license Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license allows an unlimited number of persons to reproduce and share the Licensed Material in all media and formats. Any use of the Licensed Material shall contain an identification of its Creator(s) and must be for non-commercial purposes only.
