Body and auto-communication in contemporary performance and participation art

Authors

  • Alina V. Venkova Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia; The Likhachev Russian Research Institute for Cultural and Natural Heritage
  • Andrey Yu. Chukurov Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
  • Marija A. Kusnetsova Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33910/2687-1262-2021-3-1-34-39

Keywords:

communication, auto-communication, performance, participation, body, feminism, art text

Abstract

The article focuses on the social and physical body and communication in art and, more specifically, on the issue of auto-communication. The authors consider the body primarily from the standpoint of the performance art practice, where the body plays a central role as a material, object and means of expression. The article is also focused on the problem of boundaries, since analysis of this problem is a prerequisite for revealing the role of the body and determining the specifics of communication as such. Performance deals with both the physical and the social body, which makes performance auto-communication a vivid example of an intellectual game with the mechanism of constructing not only the physical body, but also the social one. We indicate in the course of our analysis that entering the information era chronologically coincides with the growth of the third-wave feminism which created a new semiotic system in performative communication. This fact, in turn, influenced the manifestation nature of such kind of narratives. It is obvious that the transparency of borders in the information era coupled with total control and self-control (which is quite natural for the same situation of “information transparency”) makes a person try to develop more and more new mechanisms of “escaping” and building clearly visible boundaries between himself and the environment — which is a natural form of the survival instinct realization. The protest nature of new art forms, especially those associated with the phenomenon of corporeality, also becomes quite natural. The authors come to the conclusion that translation of meaning in the communicative model of “I”—“I” inevitably transforms the speaker and makes him unequal to himself. Today the affective, bodily and psychological dimension

References

ЛИТЕРАТУРА

Бавильский, Д. (2004) Скотомизация. Диалоги с Олегом Куликом. М.: Ад Маргинем, 313 с.

Буррио, Н. (2016) Реляционная эстетика. Постпродукция. М.: Ад Маргинем, 216 с.

Гумбрехт, Х. У. (2006) Производство присутствия: чего не может передать значение. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 184 с.

Деникин, А. А. (2018) К определению термина «партиципация» в контексте современных художественных практик. Наука телевидения, т. 14, № 1, с. 58–79. https://www.doi.org/10.30628/1994-9529-2018-14.1-58-79

Ковалева, О. А. (2019) Понятие «массы» в философии Элиаса Канетти. В кн.: М. И. Раковская (ред.). Научно- исследовательская работа обучающихся и молодых ученых: материалы 71-й Всероссийской (с международным участием) научной конференции обучающихся и молодых ученых. Петрозаводск: Издательство ПетрГУ, с. 171–174.

Леман, Х.-Т. (2013) Постдраматический театр. М.: ABCDesign, 312 с.

Скэрдеруд, Ф. (2003) Беспокойство. Путешествие в себя. Самара: Бахрах-М, 480 с.

Фишер-Лихте, Э. (2015) Эстетика перформативности. М.: Play&Play; Канон+, 375 с.

REFERENCES

Bavil’skij, D. (2004) Skotomizatsiya. Dialogi s Olegom Kulikom [Scotomization. Dialogues with Oleg Kulik]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press, 313 p. (In Russian)

Bourriaud, N. (2016) Esthétique relationnelle: Postproduction. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press, 216 p. (In Russian)

Denikin, A. A. (2018) K opredeleniyu termina “partitsipatsiya” v kontekste sovremennykh khudozhestvennykh praktik [Concerning the definition of a term “participation” in the context of contemporary artistic practices]. Nauka televideniya — The Art and Science of Television, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 58–79. https://www.doi.org/10.30628/1994-9529-2018-14.1-58-79 (In Russian)

Gumbrecht, H. U. (2006) Production of presence: What meaning cannot convey. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 184 p. (In Russian)

Fischer-Lichte, E. (2015) Estetika performativnosti [The transformative power of performance: A new aesthetics]. Moscow: Play&Play Publ.; Kanon+ Publ., 375 p. (In Russian)

Kovaleva, O. A. (2019) Ponyatie “massy” v filosofii Eliasa Kanetti [The concept of “mass” in the philosophy of Elias Canetti]. In: M. I. Rakovskaya (ed.). Nauchno-issledovatel’skaya rabota obuchayushchikhsya i molodykh uchenykh: materialy 71-j Vserossijskoj (s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem) nauchnoj konferentsii obuchayushchikhsya i molodykh uchenykh [Research work of students and young scientists: Materials of the 71st All-Russian (with international participation) scientific conference of students and young scientists]. Petrozavodsk: Petrozavodsk State University Publ., pp. 171–174. (In Russian)

Lehmann, H.-T. (2013) Postdramaticheskij teatr [Postdramatisches theater]. Moscow: ABCDesign Publ., 312 p. (In Russian)

Skårderud, F. (2003) Bespokojstvo. Puteshestvie v sebya [Turmoil: A journey into the modern self]. Samara: Bakhrakh-M Publ., 480 p. (In Russian)

Published

2021-06-01

Issue

Section

Articles